Mj. Stones et D. Pittman, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUDES ABOUT ELDER ABUSE - THE ELDER ABUSE ATTITUDE TEST (EAAT), Canadian journal on aging, 14, 1995, pp. 61-71
This research examined individual differences in attitudes about elder
abuse and other concerns in contemporary social morality. Study 1 was
part of a larger investigation intended to identify examples of elder
abuse through a survey of 572 seniors and practioners. Using a series
of construct validation filters, a unifactorial Elder Abuse Attitude
Test (EAAT) was developed that measures individual differences in eval
uating examples of elder abuse. The EAAT contains 13 items and had an
internal consistency exceeding .9. Study 2 included the EAAT in a surv
ey of attitudes about wider social issues. Data on the EAAT, 31 survey
items, and indexes of extremity and agreement set were analysed for 2
57 respondents. Zero-order and factor analysis showed relationships of
the EAAT with extremity set and items stating that society should pro
vide fiscal and other resources towards the prevention and remediation
of child, spousal, and elder abuse. Attitude extremity was uncorrelat
ed with four other attitude factors. We conclude that people more pron
e to attitude extremity have stronger convictions about the responsibi
lity of society to attenuate abusive situations.