Bg. Prove et al., NATURE AND MAGNITUDE OF SOIL-EROSION IN SUGARCANE LAND ON THE WET TROPICAL COAST OF NORTH-EASTERN QUEENSLAND, Australian journal of experimental agriculture, 35(5), 1995, pp. 641-649
This paper reports measures of soil erosion in sloping sugarcane land
under conventional cultivation and various no-tillage surface manageme
nt techniques and explores the reasons for the differences measured. S
oil erosion from conventionally cultivated ratoon cane lands was measu
red in the range 47-505 t/ha.year, with an average annual loss of 148
t/ha.year. No-tillage practices reduced this erosion to <15 t/ha.year.
Groundcover did not affect soil erosion significantly. In the absence
of hydrological data, it is anticipated that consolidation of the soi
l surface at harvest, rather than ground surface cover, is the dominan
t factor reducing soil erosion. The effect of groundcover on soil eros
ion is less than the accuracy of the measurement techniques employed (
+/- 20 t/ha.year). Physical and chemical analyses of in situ and erode
d soil indicate that sediment from the no-tillage practice may be tran
sported further from the erosion site and carry a more mobile fraction
of nutrients.