Learning vector quantization often requires extensive experimentation
with the learning rate distribution and update neighborhood used durin
g iteration towards good prototypes. A single winner prototype control
s the updates. This paper discusses two soft relatives of LVQ: the sof
t competition scheme (SCS) of Yair et al. and fuzzy LVQ=FLVQ. These al
gorithms both extend the update neighborhood to all nodes in the netwo
rk. SCS is a sequential, deterministic method with learning rates that
are partially based on posterior probabilities. FLVQ is a batch algor
ithm whose learning rates are derived from fuzzy memberships. We show
that SCS learning rates can be interpreted in terms of statistical dec
ision theory, and derive several relationships between SCS and FLVQ. L
imit analysis shows that the learning rates of these two algorithms ha
ve opposite tendencies. Numerical examples illustrate the difficulty o
f choosing good algorithmic parameters for SCS. Finally, we elaborate
the relationship between FLVQ. Fuzzy c-Means, Hard c-Means, a batch ve
rsion of LVQ and SCS.