Ar. Johenning et al., INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE IN PREGNANCY, Hypertension in pregnancy, 14(3), 1995, pp. 301-311
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the
magnitude of interobserver variability present when measuring Korotko
ff phase 4 versus phase 5 in pregnant women. Methods: Three observers
with different backgrounds simultaneously measured both phase 4 and ph
ase 5 on 98 gravidas. Data were used to estimate detectability rates,
perform an analysis of variance to assess interobserver variability, e
xamine the distribution of interobserver differences, and evaluate the
magnitude of the difference between the two diastolic end points. Mai
n Outcome Measures: Detectability rates of phase 4 and phase 5 diastol
ic pressure and measures of interobserver variability in diastolic rea
dings. Results: Detectability rates were observer dependent, ranging f
rom 81% to 96% for phase 4 and from 79% to 85% for phase 5. Analysis o
f variance demonstrated similar degrees of interobserver variability f
or both end points. Likewise, for any two observers measuring either e
nd point, there was a similar number of measurements that differed by
at least 8 mm Hg. Lastly, the median difference between the two end po
ints was estimated to be 6-12 mm Hg, depending on the observer. Conclu
sions: These results do not convincingly favor use of either Korotkoff
4 or Korotkoff 5 in pregnancy. Detectability rates differ among obser
vers and interobserver variability in measurement of blood pressure is
significant; improved training for all is suggested.