CHEMOTHERAPY IN GASTRIC-CANCER - AN ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF THE FAM (5-FLUOROURACIL, ADRIAMYCIN, MITOMYCIN-C) VERSUS ELF (ETOPOSIDE, LEUCOVORIN, 5-FLUOROURACIL) REGIMENS
J. Norum et V. Angelsen, CHEMOTHERAPY IN GASTRIC-CANCER - AN ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF THE FAM (5-FLUOROURACIL, ADRIAMYCIN, MITOMYCIN-C) VERSUS ELF (ETOPOSIDE, LEUCOVORIN, 5-FLUOROURACIL) REGIMENS, Journal of chemotherapy, 7(5), 1995, pp. 455-459
The prognosis in gastric cancer has been almost unchanged for the last
20 years. At the time of diagnosis the majority of patients have diss
eminated disease. The 5-year survival is only about 15%. Several effor
ts with numerous antineoplastic regimens have been studied. The most w
idely used regimen has been the FAM (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, mitom
ycin C) regimen. Because of the cardiotoxicity and dose intensity of t
he FAM regimen, a low toxicity regimen, the ELF (etoposide, leucovorin
, 5-fluorouracil) regimen, has been introduced. We present the data fr
om the treatment of 26 patients (17 FAM, 9 ELF) with advanced gastric
cancer at the University Hospital of Tromso. The monthly costs of FAM
and ELF treatment were calculated to a price of pound 553 and pound 29
76 (British pounds). The median survival of 5 months (FAM) and 6 month
s (ELF) is in accordance with other studies. Assuming that the median
survival in our study is correct, the cost of one year saved was pound
123,834, while the cost of one QALY (quality adjusted life year) empl
oying the ELF compared to the FAM regimen was pound 104,334. We conclu
de that the standard ELF regimen too expensive in the treatment of gas
tric cancer.