J. Cremer et al., RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURAL DEFECTS IN BJORK-SHILEY CONVEXO-CONCAVE PROSTHESES, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 9(7), 1995, pp. 373-377
Following the implantation of Bjork Shiley 60 degrees convexo-concave
(BS-CC) prostheses, outlet strut fracture rates up to 2.5% per year ha
ve been reported, According to experimental results and clinical obser
vations, single leg separations are regarded as the primary mechanisms
leading to complete outlet strut fracture after a certain interval, I
n an experimental study the question was addressed, whether single leg
separation can be identified by especially developed radiographic mea
ns, before outlet strut fracture occurs, Five BS-CC mitral prostheses
(29-31 mm) with intentionally made single leg separations of defined g
ap sizes (0-75 mu m) and one intact mitral prostheses were implanted i
n sheep in a double-blind study design, Repeat non-invasive investigat
ions were then performed applying a recently developed fluoroscopy ima
ging technique with direct radiographic magnification (DIMA COR C22),
Single leg separations with gap sizes of more than 25 mu m were proper
ly detected using DIMA COR C22. Separations 25 mu m or less could not
be detected with certainty but were evaluated as probable or possible
as a result of multiple investigations. The intact prosthesis was corr
ectly identified, but was investigated on only one occasion, Non-invas
ive control of Bjork-Shiley CC mitral prostheses applying especially d
eveloped direct radiographic magnification may allow for a reliable as
sessment of single leg separtion with gap sizes of more than 25 mu m i
n sheep, Using this technique of non-invasive serial investigations on
particular patients with high probability of outlet strut fracture ap
pears feasible, anticipating single leg separation detectability in hu
mans, This has to be assessed in a second step, Thus, elective reopera
tion may be scheduled according to the detection of single leg separat
ion rather than solely on epidemiologically defined risk-benefit ratio
s in these patients.