'During the past years, laparoscopy has grown in popularity and become
an alternative technique for the treatment of certain pathologies in
urological practice. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedures for urete
ral surgery were first attempted by Wickham in 1979: in this case a pa
tient with a ureteral calculus underwent a successful ureterolithotomy
; More recently, the introduction of the Gaur balloon has permitted qu
ick dilatation and easier access to the retroperitoneum. However, in c
omparison, the transperitoneal method offers more space and better vis
ion for identification of anatomical landmarks. In our clinic, we have
performed laparoscopic ureteral surgery using the transperitoneal as
well as the retroperitoneal approach. For situations requiring reconst
ructive surgery, we preferred the transperitoneal approach in 3 cases
of ureterolysis;2 diagnostical and 1 therapeutical. On the other hand,
the retroperitoneal approach was employed for carrying out 2 pyelopla
sty, 1 ureterocutaneostomy and 1 ureterolithotomy. Furthermore, we per
formed in similar fashion 3 nephroureterectomy and 1 heminephrectomy c
ombined with partial ureterectomy In 3 cases, transperitoneal nephrour
eterectomy with transurethral orifice circumcision was carried out. In
all patients, laparoscopy revealed low morbidity with low grade posto
perative pain and shorter hospital stay. Our experience shows that the
progressive use of retroperitoneoscopic surgery can maintain minimal
invasiveness and permit good access to various procedures without comp
lications connected to use of the Veress needle or the presence of abd
ominal adhesions. In addition to our own laparoscopic experience, we h
ave reviewed the literature and report on the most frequent ureteral s
urgery performed laparoscopically.