EVALUATION OF THE APHID-DAY STANDARD AS A PREDICTOR OF YIELD LOSS CAUSED BY CEREAL APHIDS

Citation
Rw. Kieckhefer et al., EVALUATION OF THE APHID-DAY STANDARD AS A PREDICTOR OF YIELD LOSS CAUSED BY CEREAL APHIDS, Agronomy journal, 87(5), 1995, pp. 785-788
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
00021962
Volume
87
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
785 - 788
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-1962(1995)87:5<785:EOTASA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Accurate prediction of yield loss caused by cereal aphids in small gra ins involves assessment of the aphid population density on plants, the duration of their feeding, and the growth stage of the crop at the ti me of feeding. In this research, aphid-day (one aphid feeding on one p lant for 24 h) unitage was used as a standard to compare the effects o f feeding by greenbug, Schizaphis graminum (Rondani), Russian wheat ap hid (RWA), Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko), and bird cherry-oat aphid (BCO ), Rhopalosiphum padi (L.), on the growth and yield of spring wheat, T riticum aestivum L., to measure the degree of additivity of yield loss caused by aphid feeding on the same plants at several stages of plant growth, and to evaluate the adequacy of the aphid-day standard as a p redictor of yield loss. Results of greenhouse experiments with a scale d series of aphid-day components (150 aphids x 2 d; 75 x 4 d; 50 x 6 d ; 25 x 12 d) of equal total value (300 aphid-days) showed that the thr ee aphid species were similarly damaging to yield but that for RWA and BCO the 25 x 12 d combination was significantly (P less than or equal to 0.01) more damaging than the other aphid-day treatments for those species. The administration of escalating aphid-day dosages to plants concomitant with advancing plant growth stages (two-leaf, 300 aphid-da ys; four-leaf, 400 aphid-days; two-leaf + four-leaf, 700 aphid-days; b oot, 1200 aphid-days; two-leaf + boot, 1500 aphid-days; milk, 200 aphi d-days; two-leaf + milk, 2300 aphid-days) revealed that yield loss cau sed by aphid feeding at two plant growth stages was usually significan tly (P less than or equal to 0.01) greater than that at a single stage , but was not fully additive simply as the arithmetic sum of the yield losses at the two stages. Yield losses due to aphid feeding (expresse d as milligrams per 100 aphid-days) declined precipitously with advanc ing plant growth stage. These results show that the aphid-day unitage, properly interpreted in relation to the aphid species involved and th e growth stage of the crop, is a useful predictor of grain yield loss at harvest. Relating cumulative aphid-days at successive plant growth stages to ultimate yield loss enables producers to make informed decis ions about the need for and timing of rescue chemical treatments.