Most companies have found that of the 14 OSHA PSM elements, Mechanical
Integrity (MI) presents the greatest implementation challenge. Althou
gh maintenance departments have successfully installed, repaired, and
replaced plant equipment of decades, many of these same maintenance de
partments have struggled with OSHA's PSM requirements. One major chall
enge is prioritizing resources. Opportunities to improve will always e
xist; however, it is often difficult to effectively allocate money and
manpower. Another challenge is simply getting organized. The MI progr
am should be supported by appropriate, useful procedures; but given th
e multifaceted and ever-changing nature of maintenance, what procedure
s should be written? How detailed should the procedures be? With nearl
y 3 years of PSM of enforcement complete, an analysis of OSHA's MI cit
ations helps to provide insight to these challenges. This paper presen
ts ideas for implementing MI in a manner that meets OSHA's expectation
s while contributing to safe, effective maintenance in PSM-covered pro
cesses. In particular, the paper presents ideas for developing MI prog
rams that effectively prioritize company resources, with appropriate i
nspection/test/preventive maintenance and quality assurance (QA) activ
ities. This paper also presents ideas for developing a list of mechani
cal integrity procedures to address OSHA's requirements as well as the
type of information to include in those procedures.