DESCRIPTION OF HYDROLASE-ENANTIOSELECTIVITY MUST BE BASED ON THE ACTUAL KINETIC MECHANISM - ANALYSIS OF THE KINETIC RESOLUTION OF GLYCIDYL (2,3-EPOXY-1-PROPYL) BUTYRATE BY PIG PANCREAS LIPASE
Jba. Vantol et al., DESCRIPTION OF HYDROLASE-ENANTIOSELECTIVITY MUST BE BASED ON THE ACTUAL KINETIC MECHANISM - ANALYSIS OF THE KINETIC RESOLUTION OF GLYCIDYL (2,3-EPOXY-1-PROPYL) BUTYRATE BY PIG PANCREAS LIPASE, Biocatalysis and biotransformation, 12(2), 1995, pp. 99-117
The kinetic resolution of R,S-glycidyl (R,S-2,3-epoxy-1-propyl) butyra
te catalyzed by pig pancreas lipase (PPL) was studied in monophasic an
d biphasic systems. The course of the resolution at ester concentratio
ns exceeding 0.05 M or in the presence of R,S-glycidol (R,S-2,3-epoxy-
1-propanol), could not be described by the equations derived for a one
substrate enzyme with a minimal kinetic scheme (Chen el al., 1987). T
rivial causes like heterogeneity in activity of the (crude) PPL prepar
ation and equilibrium phenomena due to changing phase ratios could be
excluded. An equation based on the kinetic mechanism of hydrolases, in
which the acyl-enzyme intermediate is allowed to react with water as
well as with the produced alcohol (quantified by the selectivity const
ant, alpha), was evaluated. All initial rate and conversion data could
be adequately fitted with this equation, not only for PPL in the mono
phasic (free in solution) but also in the biphasic (adsorbed to the in
terface) systems where it exhibited better activity and enantioselecti
vity. Thus, the enantiomeric ratio (E) and alpha are intrinsic paramet
ers of PPL, remaining constant during the course of the reaction. The
correctness of the approach for the PPL-system indicates that descript
ion of enantioselectivity must be based on the actual kinetic mechanis
m of hydrolases.