By providing three arguments Klauer (1995) attempts to demonstrate tha
t the comparative evaluation study by Hasselhorn and Hager (1995) is o
f no consequence, both from a scientific and a practical point of view
. As is shown, none of the partly inconsistent arguments gives rise to
any doubts about the message of our study: There are good reasons to
be sceptical with regard to the relative effectiveness of recent progr
ams for improving children's thinking as compared with customary perce
ptual exercises. This statement, however, should not be misinterpreted
as the assertion that the programs are not effective, since this ques
tion has not been investigated in our study.