Historically hypnosis with deaf people has been an underutilized inter
vention as the deaf were assumed not to be responsive to hypnotic sugg
estion. Recent research has begun to challenge these assumptions. Matt
hews and Isenberg (in press) compared the hypnotic responsiveness of d
eaf and hearing subjects on the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale
, form C (SHSS:C) all of whom received the hypnotic suggestions via si
gn language. Those results supported the notion that deaf subjects are
capable of responding to hypnotic suggestion and may be as hypnotical
ly responsive as hearing subjects. The purpose of the present article
is to examine the similarities and differences of responses between de
af and hearing subjects to the individual items of the SHSS:C and comp
are those responses to the SHSS:C norms.