ESTIMATION OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBU LL FUNCTION FOR GENERATING DIAMETER DISTRIBUTIONS

Authors
Citation
J. Nagel et Gs. Biging, ESTIMATION OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE WEIBU LL FUNCTION FOR GENERATING DIAMETER DISTRIBUTIONS, Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 166(9-10), 1995, pp. 185-189
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Forestry
ISSN journal
00025852
Volume
166
Issue
9-10
Year of publication
1995
Pages
185 - 189
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-5852(1995)166:9-10<185:EOTPOT>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Knowing the distribution of tree diameters is of great importance in t he evaluation and management of forest stands. Modern single tree simu lators often require as input a list of individual trees with, their a ssociated sizes (diameter and height, for example). Diameter distribut ions are useful in this regard because they can provide a list of tree s and diameters for simulation based upon simple stand summary statist ics. Height/diameter equations can then be used to supply the missing heights for each of the trees generated from the diameter distribution . Then the individual trees are grown in height and diameter through t ime in the simulator. One of the most accurate and flexible functions for modelling diameter distributions is the Weibull probability densit y function. It has 2 primary parameters. The b-parameter controls the scale and the c-parameter influences the shape (form) of the Weibull f unction. In some formulations there is also an a-parameter which is a location parameter. In this study these parameters are predicted as a function of two easily measured stand parameters: Dg (quadratic mean d iameter) and Dmax (maximal diameter). Finally a diameter distribution is created from the estimated b- and c-parameters. Trees are sampled f rom this distribution until a specified basal area is obtained. The ac tual number of trees was then compared to the number of trees predicte d with this method and good results were obtained. In most cases the p ercentage differences between observed and predicted number of trees w ere under 10 %. For stands greater than 80 years in age the difference s were under 5 % for all species studied.