C. Savariaux et al., COMPENSATION STRATEGIES FOR THE PERTURBATION OF THE ROUNDED VOWEL [U]USING A LIP TUBE - A STUDY OF THE CONTROL SPACE IN SPEECH PRODUCTION, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5), 1995, pp. 2428-2442
A labial perturbation of the French rounded vowel [u] was used to exam
ine the respective weights of the articulatory and acoustic levels in
the control of vowel production. A 20-mm-diam lip tube was inserted be
tween the lips of the speakers. Acoustic and x-ray articulatory data w
ere obtained for isolated vowel productions by 11 native French speake
rs in normal and lip-tube conditions. Compensation abilities were eval
uated through accuracy of the F1-F2. pattern. Possible compensations w
ere examined from nomograms using the new model of Fant [ISCLP 92 Proc
eedings (University of Alberta, Edmonton, 1992)]. Acoustic interpretat
ions of the articulatory changes were made by generating area function
s from midsagittal views, used together with a harmonic acoustic model
. For the first perturbed trial, immediately after the insertion of th
e tube, no speaker was able to produce a complete compensation, but cl
ear differences between speakers were observed: Seven of them moved th
e tongue and hence limited the deterioration of the F1-F2 pattern, whe
reas the remaining four did not show any pertinent articulatory change
. These data support the idea of speaker-specific internal representat
ions of the articulatory-to-acoustic relationships. The results for th
e following 19 perturbed trials indicate that speakers used the acoust
ic signal in order to elaborate an optimal compensation strategy. One
speaker achieved complete compensation by changing his constriction lo
cation from a velo-palatal to a velo-pharyngeal region of the vocal tr
act. Six others moved their tongues in the right direction, achieving
partial acoustic compensation, while the remaining four did not compen
sate. The control of speech production thus seems to be directed towar
d achieving an auditory goal, but completely achieving the goal may be
impossible because of speaker-dependent articulatory constraints. It
is suggested that these constraints are due more to speaker-specific i
nternal representation of articulatory-to-acoustic relationships rathe
r than to anatomical or neurophysiological limitations. Speech control
could thus be ensured partly with the use of this internal representa
tion, and partly - particularly under perturbed conditions - by monito
ring the acoustic signal. (C) 1995 Acoustical Society of America.