Sr. Insler et al., LIDOCAINE AND THE INHIBITION OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN CORONARY-ARTERYBYPASS PATIENTS, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 9(5), 1995, pp. 541-546
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Objective: This study was designed to evaluate whether a continuous lo
w-dose lidocaine infusion reduces postoperative pain and anxiety in pa
tients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to retros
pectively examine time to extubation, intensive care unit stay (ICU),
and hospital length of stay. Design: A double-blinded, randomized, and
prospective approach. Setting: Hospital patients undergoing first-tim
e CABG. Participants: After informed consent, 100 patients were enroll
ed in this study. Interventions: Lidocaine infusion or placebo substit
ute was begun after induction of anesthesia. The fentanyl/midazolam in
fusion was discontinued on ICU admission; lidocaine or placebo continu
ed until ICU discharge. Supplemental fentanyl, midazolam, or propranol
ol was administered for pain, anxiety, or hemodynamic stress. Measurem
ents and Main Results: Drug dosages were compared between groups. Post
operative assessment included visual analog pain score, hemodynamics,
sedation score, and nursing assessment. Mean total dosages of fentanyl
, midazolam, and propranolol between the lidocaine and placebo groups
were 620.40 +/- 815.74 mu g versus 689.16 +/- 692.99 mu g, p = 0.244;
0.54 +/- 1.13 mg versus 1.20 +/- 2.44 mg, p = 0.465; 0.11 +/- 0.75 mg
versus 3.56 +/- 17.2 mg, p = 0.564, respectively. Times to extubation,
ICU length of stay, and hospital stay did not achieve statistical sig
nificance. Conclusions: Continuous infusion of low-dose lidocaine did
not significantly decrease supplemental fentanyl, midazolam, br propra
nolol requirement postoperatively. Similarly, a lidocaine infusion doe
s not result in reduced time to extubation, ICU stay, or hospital leng
th of stay. (C) 1995 by W.B. Saunders Company