MODELING ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION AT THE EARTHS SURFACE .2. MODEL AND INSTRUMENT COMPARISON

Citation
Pmd. Forster et al., MODELING ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION AT THE EARTHS SURFACE .2. MODEL AND INSTRUMENT COMPARISON, Journal of applied meteorology, 34(11), 1995, pp. 2426-2439
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
ISSN journal
08948763
Volume
34
Issue
11
Year of publication
1995
Pages
2426 - 2439
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-8763(1995)34:11<2426:MUATES>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
High-resolution measurements in the spectral region of 280-400 nm usin g a double monochromator are compared with detailed radiative transfer calculations at Reading, United Kingdom (52 degrees N, 0 degrees), fo r dear and totally overcast days, using aerosol and cloud information deduced from empirical methods. For clear skies, instrument and model agree well in the UVA (320-400 nm), but agreement is worse in the UVB (280-320 nm). A number of possible reasons for the discrepancies are e xplored. Volcanic aerosols in the stratosphere of the model are found to improve agreement between the model and the instrument for high sol ar zenith angles by increasing the model UVB irradiances by as much as 6%. Convolving the model surface irradiances with the bandpass of the instrument leads to smaller differences between instrument and model at short wavelengths and also reduces the noisiness of the difference. When the model included stratospheric aerosol and the instrument's ba ndpass function, UVB irradiances within 10% of the measured irradiance s could be produced by the model for clear skies. For cloudy condition s, differences between instrument and model are larger, reaching 20%, integrated over the UVB.