PROMOTION OF N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE-INITIATED HEPATOCELLULAR TUMORS AND HEPATOBLASTOMAS BY 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN OR AROCLOR-1254 IN C57BL 6, DBA/2, AND B6D2F1 MICE/
Le. Beebe et al., PROMOTION OF N-NITROSODIETHYLAMINE-INITIATED HEPATOCELLULAR TUMORS AND HEPATOBLASTOMAS BY 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN OR AROCLOR-1254 IN C57BL 6, DBA/2, AND B6D2F1 MICE/, Cancer research, 55(21), 1995, pp. 4875-4880
To investigate the hypothesis that tumor promotion by chlorinated arom
atic hydrocarbons involves Ah receptor occupation and subsequent induc
tion of cytochromes P-450 1a-1, effects of Aroclor 1254 or 2,3,7,8-tet
rachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) were examined in N-nitrosodiethylamine
-initiated mice with different Ah receptor phenotype. Levels of cytoch
romes P-450 1a and 2b were measured by enzyme assay and Western immuno
blots. Males of the C57BL/6, DBA/2, or (C57BL/6 x DBA/2)F-1 (hereafter
referred to as ''B6D2F1'') strain were initiated with a single i.p. d
ose of N-nitrosodiethylamine (90 mg/kg body weight), followed by eithe
r multiple doses of TCDD (0.05 mu g/kg) weekly or Aroclor 1254 chronic
ally in the diet (100 ppm) for 20 weeks, and then no treatment for 24
weeks. Lung tumor incidence or multiplicity was not altered by either
of the promoters. Liver tumor incidence was similar among the three st
rains after N-nitrosodiethylamine alone (14, 21, and 21%, respectively
). In DBA/2 mice, TCDD neither induced Cyp 1a nor promoted liver tumor
s. Aroclor caused an 8-fold induction of hepatic Cyp 2b, which was its
maximum at the 12-week time point but did not promote tumors. Inducti
ons of hepatic Cyp 1a by TCDD and la and 2b by Aroclor were similar in
C57BL/6 and B6D2F1 mice, but tumor promotion responses were quite dif
ferent. Dietary Aroclor significantly promoted Liver tumors in C57BL/6
mice (59 versus 14%) but not in B6D2F1 mice (24 versus 21%). Repeated
TCDD promoted only in B6D2F1 mice (52 versus 21%) and not in C57BL/6
mice (19 versus 14%). Thus, whereas these data confirm that a function
al Ah receptor is required for Liver tumor promotion, the degree of ac
tivation as measured by induction of Cyp 1a is not directly related to
the degree of tumor-promoting capability, Other genetic factors must
play a role in mediating the final tumor outcome.