The proverbial ''dogs'' have been closed, and high-performing noncore
businesses have gone to the highest bidders. For large corporations th
at are refocusing their portfolios, the problem of how best to dispose
of basically sound but underperforming businesses remains. Putting a
business up for sale can be its kiss of death, with employee morale pl
ummeting and prospective buyers unaware of the business's true potenti
al value. The solution may be a restructuring joint venture, an arrang
ement that allows the buyer to learn about the business's untapped pos
sibilities before buying it outright, and that often results in higher
returns to the seller than a straight sale would. The authors contras
t the successful joint venture involving Whirlpool and Philips with th
e disastrous results of Maytag's purchase of the Chicago Pacific Corpo
ration. Restructuring joint ventures work especially well for business
es whose assets are intangible and therefore hard for a potential buye
r to gauge. In the case of IBM's Rolm Systems Division and Siemens of
Germany, for instance, IBM sold outright that portion of the Rolm busi
ness in which the primary assets were tangible and transferred the res
t to Siemens through a joint venture. As this example also shows, buye
rs often use the joint venture as an opportunity to enter new markets
beyond their national borders. The management burden imposed by restru
cturing joint ventures can be heavy, and the partners must plan carefu
lly for the end of the alliance to avoid value-destroying conflicts. H
owever, the benefits of these ventures can more than make up for the e
ffort required.