Sj. Helyer et S. Heisig, MULTILEAF COLLIMATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SHIELDING BLOCKS - A TIME AND MOTION STUDY OF BEAM SHAPING IN RADIOTHERAPY, Radiotherapy and oncology, 37(1), 1995, pp. 61-64
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
The work processes for the planning and delivery of shaped beams using
a Philips multileaf collimator were studied for two treatment techniq
ues and compared to those for conventional shielding blocks. The MLC p
roved faster in all cases of treatment delivery providing time reducti
ons of 19-48% for parallel opposed beams and 6-44% for conformal isoce
ntric beams. The workload in the mould room and workshop would be redu
ced if multileaf collimation is used. Time spent manufacturing and mou
nting blocks (average 2 h 30 min and 37 min, respectively) is eliminat
ed for the techniques studied. The physics process for generating conf
ormal MLC beams proved faster (average 1 h 36 min) than for blocks (av
erage 2 h 30 min); this was not so for parallel opposed beams. Overall
the results suggest that using the MLC is a time- and resource-saving
alternative to blocks.