CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY - A METAANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES

Citation
Sl. Sporer et al., CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY - A METAANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES, Psychological bulletin, 118(3), 1995, pp. 315-327
Citations number
102
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology,Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00332909
Volume
118
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
315 - 327
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-2909(1995)118:3<315:CCAA-A>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
There is widespread agreement among researchers that the correlation b etween identification accuracy and confidence in identification judgme nts is weak. For this reason, many experts caution against heavy relia nce on confidence when evaluating identification accuracy. The authors present a meta-analytic review of 30 studies using staged-event metho ds that include target-present and target-absent lineups. Although the overall confidence-accuracy correlation in these studies corresponds to that reported in previous reviews, including choice as a moderator variable leads to a somewhat different conclusion. For choosers (those making positive identification), the confidence-accuracy correlation was reliably and consistently higher than for nonchoosers. In addition , the mean confidence level for correct choosers is higher than that f or incorrect choosers in every study.