L. Pouw et al., HEPARIN THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS VIA INDWELLING SUBCUTANEOUS TEFLON CANNULA, Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery, 65(11), 1995, pp. 793-795
The aim of this study was to evaluate the administration of postoperat
ive heparin thromboprophylaxis via an indwelling subcutaneous cannula.
Fifty consecutive patients undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy or vari
cose vein surgery were studied. Each patient on admission had a 24 gau
ge subcutaneous cannula inserted and a conventional subcutaneous hepar
in injection preoperatively. The first 20 patients received an alterna
ting postoperative regimen of morning heparin via cannula and evening
heparin via conventional injection into the abdominal wall. The remain
ing 30 patients received postoperative heparin twice daily via the can
nula. Patients and nursing staff were interviewed and their preference
for either method was recorded. There were no significant complicatio
ns with the cannula system. Although it was more costly and nursing st
aff found it more labour intensive than conventional subcutaneous inje
ctions, the majority of patients preferred to receive heparin via the
cannula. We conclude that this is an excellent method of administering
prophylactic subcutaneous heparin, especially for patients with a str
ong aversion to injections.