Myocardial perfusion reserve (hyperemic divided by basal myocardial bl
ood flow) describes vasodilator responsiveness of coronaryresistive ve
ssels. The effect of aging and gender on myocardial perfusion reserve
remains controversial. Methods: We studied 56 normal volunteers (21 wo
men, 35 men; aged 50 +/- 20 yr, range 21-86 yr) with O-15-water PET to
measure myocardial blood flow during basal and hyperemic stales with
intravenous dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg, n = 46) or adenosine (140 mu g/k
g/min, n = 10). For comparative analysis, patients were grouped accord
ing to age: <30 yr (n = 11), 30-49 yr (n = 18), 50-69 yr (n = 15) and
greater than or equal to 70 yr (n = 12). Results: Overall, basal flow
was 1.00 +/- 0.26 ml/min/g and hyperemic flow was 3.31 +/- 1.38 ml/min
/g, resulting in a myocardial perfusion reserve of 3.38 +/- 1.35. Ther
e was an increase in basal flow with age (r = 0.45, p < 0.025), althou
gh hyperemic flow was only lower in patients greater than or equal to
70 yr, causing a significant reduction in myocardial perfusion reserve
: 3.54 +/- 0.96 in <30 yr, 4.23 +/- 1.35 in 30-49 yr, 3.51 +/- 1.21 in
50-69 yr and 1.94 +/- 0.46 in greater than or equal to 70 yr (p < 0.0
5 versus all groups <70 yr). Conclusion: Myocardial blood flow during
basal and hyperemia conditions are roughly comparable up to 60 yr of a
ge. Above this age, there is significant increase in basal flow associ
ated with an increase in systolic blood pressure. Above 70 yr, there i
s a significant reduction in hyperemic flow, and thus myocardial perfu
sion reserve independent of hemodynamic response to vasodilator stress
.