Two new developments promise to greatly improve our ability to reconst
ruct the evolution of the human life cycle: 1. the introduction of the
comparative methodology of life history into anthropology and 2. rese
arch on bone and dental development that reveals a world of life histo
ry preserved in the fossil record. Comparative study suggests that the
human strategy depends on rich energy sources and low mortality and t
hat our general rate of growth and aging evolved in parallel with brai
n size. It now appears that the australopithecines were a substantiall
y primitive grade of hominid with life histories more like apes than h
umans. The life cycle of early Homo erectus was probably unlike any li
ving hominoid: Evidence suggests that it grew up somewhat faster than
living humans, it lacked an adolescent growth spurt, and H. erectus in
fants were more helpless than those of chimpanzees (but conceivably of
more mature body proportion and motor advancement than our own). The
appearance of fully modern life histories is still not fully resolved:
Early Pleistocene Homo probably did not share them, and late Pleistoc
ene hominids probably did, but life history is still little documented
in the intervening million years. Although many details remain to be
uncovered, the combination of advancing method and theory should soon
lead to more robust models of human origins.