S. Leyer et al., THE ROLE OF THE C-TERMINUS OF THE INSULIN B-CHAIN IN MODULATING STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES OF THE HORMONE, International journal of peptide & protein research, 46(5), 1995, pp. 397-407
Within the scope of structure-function studies on the proteohormone in
sulin, the role of the C-terminal segment B26-B30 for self-association
and receptor interaction was analyzed. Insulin derivatives with modif
ications in the region B26-B30 were synthesized by trypsin-catalyzed c
oupling reactions of des-(B23-B30)-insulin with synthetic peptides. Th
e peptides were obtained by Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis. Insuli
ns with multiple amino acid --> glycine substitutions were examined to
distinguish between the influence of the side chains and the influenc
e of the main chain in positions B27-B30 on the self-association of th
e hormone. The analogues [Gly(B27,B28,B29,B30)]insulin and [Gly(B27,B2
8,B30)]insulin exhibit relative receptor affinities of 80% and self-as
sociate. The successive extension of [Ala(B26)]des-(B27-B30)-insulin-B
26-amide (relative receptor binding 273%) with amino acids correspondi
ng to the native sequence B27-B30 showed the influence of the length o
f the B-chain on receptor affinity: the extension by B27-threonine ami
de reduces receptor binding to 71%, all further prolongations have onl
y small effects on the binding. The effect of the B28-side chain on ma
in-chain conformation, self-association and receptor binding was exami
ned with [X(B28)]des-(B29-B30)-insulin-B28-amides(X = Phe, Gly, D-Pro)
. While the glycine and D-proline analogues (relative binding 104 and
143%, respectively) retain the self-association properties typical of
insulin, [Phe(B28)]des-(B29-B30)insulin-B28-amide(relative binding 50%
) shows diminished self-association. The backbone-modified insulin der
ivative Sar(B26)]des-(B27-B30)-insulin-B26-amide(sarcosine = N-methylg
lycine) exhibits an unexpectedly high receptor affinity of 1100% which
demonstrates that the B26-amide hydrogen of the native hormone is not
important for receptor binding. (C) Munksgaard 1995.