Rl. Woodward et P. Molnar, LATERAL HETEROGENEITY IN THE UPPER-MANTLE AND SS-S TRAVEL-TIME INTERVALS FOR SS-RAYS REFLECTED FROM THE TIBETAN PLATEAU AND ITS SURROUNDINGS, Earth and planetary science letters, 135(1-4), 1995, pp. 139-148
We report large differences between measured and calculated intervals
between arrival times of S waves and SS phases whose bounce points lie
beneath different parts of the Tibetan Plateau and its surroundings.
When compared with traveltimes calculated from the laterally homogeneo
us Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM), the shortest intervals be
tween SS and S correspond to paths with SS reflected from the Karakoru
m and westernmost parts of the Tibetan Plateau and Himalaya. Comparabl
e, but more scattered, SS - S residuals characterize paths with SS ref
lected beneath southern Tibet. The longest such intervals typify paths
with SS reflected beneath north central Tibet. If upper mantle struct
ure near the bounce points of SS causes these average apparent advance
s of 7 s and delays of up to 6 s, then these data suggest that materia
l with high S-wave speeds underlie the Karakorum, and low S-wave speed
s underlie north central Tibet, a result that concurs with other seism
ological observations. If such high- or low-speed regions were confine
d to the upper 250 km of the mantle, they would imply a difference on
the order of 13% in S-wave speeds between these two regions. Heterogen
eity in the lower mantle, inferred in part from these data, can, howev
er, account for part of the large variation in residuals that we obser
ve. After correcting for large-scale heterogeneity in the upper and lo
wer mantle, roughly 9 s of difference persists, which would correspond
to average differences of 9% or 0.4 km/s in S-wave speeds in the uppe
r 250 km of the mantle beneath these regions. Only at subduction zones
can one find such a difference in average S-wave speeds in the mantle
beneath regions only 500-1000 km apart, suggesting that dynamic flow
in the mantle presently occurs in the upper mantle beneath the Tibetan
Plateau. This difference supports the contention that small-scale con
vection occurs beneath the Tibetan Plateau.