Ds. Hibbett et Mj. Donoghue, PROGRESS TOWARD A PHYLOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION OF THE POLYPORACEAE THROUGH PARSIMONY ANALYSIS OF MITOCHONDRIAL RIBOSOMAL DNA-SEQUENCES, Canadian journal of botany, 73, 1995, pp. 853-861
We used sequence data from mitochondrial small-subunit ribosomal DNA t
o infer phylogenetic relationships of the Polyporaceae. We examined 62
species representing 14 families of Aphyllophorales and Agaricales. P
arsimony analyses of these sequences suggest that the Polyporaceae are
polyphyletic. Higher order relationships are poorly resolved, but sev
en groups of species are generally well supported (as measured by boot
strapping) or are congruent with previous taxonomic hypotheses. Group
1 includes Polyporus s.str., seven other genera of Polyporaceae, Lenti
nus, and Ganoderma. Because this clade contains the type species of Po
lyporus, it may serve as the core for a future recircumscription of th
e Polyporaceae. Group 2 is morphologically and ecologically diverse, b
ut all members have amyloid, ornamented spores (with the possible exce
ption of Heterobasidion). This group includes Bondarzewia, Heterobasid
ion, Hericium, Echinodontium, Lentinellus, Auriscalpium, and Russula.
Group 3 includes five exemplars of the Hymenochaetaceae, as well as Ox
yporus and Trichaptum. Trichaptum and members of the Hymenochaetaceae
are unusual among the holobasidiomycetes in their possession of imperf
orate parenthosomes. Group 4 represents the Boletaceae and includes Bo
letus and Suillus. Group 5 includes Bjerkandera, which is a polypore,
and Pulcherricium and Phanerochaete, which are corticioid. In Group 5
the corticioid habit may have been derived by reduction. Group 6 inclu
des Fomitopsis, Piptoporus, acid Daedalea, all of which are brown rot
polypores with bipolar mating systems. Group 7 includes Laetiporus and
Phaeolus. Laetiporus is classified in Polyporaceae, but Phaeolus has
been placed in both the Polyporaceae and Hymenochaetaceae. In general,
our results suggest that macromorphology is evolutionarily flexible,
but that certain anatomical and physiological characters, while not fr
ee from homoplasy, contain clues to higher order relationships of poly
pores.