Research on women and the law within the discipline of Political Scien
ce has advanced from inserting women into conventional legal paradigms
, to attacking law itself as male, to understanding law as gendered. O
bstacles within the discipline, however, hinder scholars in incorporat
ing the latest and most sophisticated work in feminist theory. Underst
anding the conditions of the production of knowledge within our discip
line leads to an accounting of the most frequent problems: appropriati
ng a conservative reading of the work of Carol Gilligan or importing a
circumscribed version of the insights of Catharine MacKinnon. After d
iagnosing some problems with scholarship in our subfield and accountin
g in part for why that occurs, I offer some tentative suggestions for
improvement.