Jr. Scarritt et S. Mcmillan, PROTEST AND REBELLION IN AFRICA - EXPLAINING CONFLICTS BETWEEN ETHNIC-MINORITIES AND THE STATE IN THE 1980S, Comparative political studies, 28(3), 1995, pp. 323-349
This article examines the sub-Saharan African portion of the global Mi
norities at Risk project. It analyzes the relationships between group
characteristics, grievances, mobilization, state characteristics, and
nonviolent protest and rebellion in Africa and compares these relation
ships with those found in a global analysis using the same data set. M
obilization is more important than group characteristics or grievances
in explaining nonviolent protest and rebellion in the 1980s globally,
and especially in Africa because political action there is taken main
ly in response to the dynamics of mobilization and state response over
the last 30 years. The state characteristics that are associated with
the two forms of political action in Africa and globally differ; in t
he former case the strongest relationships are between greater-althoug
h partial-democracy in the 1960s and nonviolent protest and between co
mpetitiveness of participation in the 1960s and rebellion. An interpre
tive explanation of these differences is presented.