FREE-HAND SEWN ALLOGRAFTS, STENTLESS (PRIMA-EDWARDS) AND STENTED (CESA) PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES - A COMPARATIVE HEMODYNAMIC-STUDY

Citation
K. Dossche et al., FREE-HAND SEWN ALLOGRAFTS, STENTLESS (PRIMA-EDWARDS) AND STENTED (CESA) PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES - A COMPARATIVE HEMODYNAMIC-STUDY, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 9(10), 1995, pp. 562-566
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
10107940
Volume
9
Issue
10
Year of publication
1995
Pages
562 - 566
Database
ISI
SICI code
1010-7940(1995)9:10<562:FSAS(A>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
In a retrospective, non-randomized study, the clinical and hemodynamic properties of 50 consecutively implanted hand-sewn allografts (group I), 50 stentless bioprostheses (group II) and 50 stented bioprostheses (group III) were compared. Preoperative hemodynamic and clinical data were identical in the three groups, except for age (group I: 54.4 +/- 8.7, group II: 67.0 +/- 5,1, group III: 70.0+/-5.1). Peak and mean gr adients and flow characteristics with echo Doppler were performed at 1 week, 6 and 12 months, For the 21, 23 and 25 diameter prostheses, gro up differences between groups II and III in peak and mean gradients we re not significant after 1 week and 1 year. In all groups, allografts had significantly lower gradients. Regurgitation (I-II) was present af ter 1 week and 1 year in group I: in 17/48 and 22/42 patients respecti vely, in group 117/49 and 11/44 patients and in group III: in 1/49 and 2/44 patients. Early mortality and morbidity were comparable in all g roups. Allografts have superior hemodynamic properties. Differences in gradients in groups II and III were not significant, though differenc es in technique allowed the implantation of a larger bioprostheses in group II. Regurgitation was most prominent in the allograft group. Imm ediate postoperative results were not influenced by the type of prosth esis.