A review of the Nearctic-Neotropical migration system reveals that: (1
) 90% of breeding land and fresh-water species in the sub-Arctic are m
igrants, 80% in southern Ontario, and 50-60% in Florida and Arizona. (
2) Insectivorous Panulinae winter from 30 degrees N to 10 degrees S; s
eed-eating Emberizinae from 40 degrees to 15 degrees N; aerial feeding
Tyrannidae and diurnal birds-of-prey trans-equatorially; and ducks fr
om 50 degrees to 5 degrees N. (3) Go-occurrence of migrant species is
facilitated by geographic and habitat allopatry, varying levels of eco
logical distinctness, sparse dispersal, and, sometimes, intraspecific
spatial separation of sexes and age-groups. (4) Migrant-resident co-oc
currence is facilitated by high proportions of the two belonging to di
fferent taxonomic and ecological groups and, within families, partial
feeding zone and habitat segregation. All, however, draw on a common f
ood pool. Too little is known about the winter food support base, diff
erential habitat utilizations, species abundances, and biological need
s, either to gauge whether interspecific competition has been a major
evolutionary factor, or to differentially predict the efforts of futur
e deleterious habitat change. In two appendixes, the Nearctic-Neotropi
cal, Palearctic-African, and Asian migration systems are compared, and
data pertaining to current population trends in Neotropical migrants
are compiled.