PECULIAR CONSTRAINTS ON LIFE-HISTORIES IMPOSED BY PROTECTIVE OR NUTRITIVE DEVICES FOR EMBRYOS

Authors
Citation
Rr. Strathmann, PECULIAR CONSTRAINTS ON LIFE-HISTORIES IMPOSED BY PROTECTIVE OR NUTRITIVE DEVICES FOR EMBRYOS, American zoologist, 35(4), 1995, pp. 426-433
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Zoology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00031569
Volume
35
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
426 - 433
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1569(1995)35:4<426:PCOLIB>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
A general constraint for sexually produced offspring of multicellular organisms is that they must begin as a single cell (lest they be chime ric) and that the embryos that produce multicellular structures perfor m many functions less capably than more developed individuals. Beyond this limitation, predictive models have examined optimized tradeoffs b etween number of offspring and size of offspring. Broadly applicable p redictions have been sought, and two general expectations have resulte d. (1) Optimal parental investment per offspring should not be affecte d by total investment per clutch when offspring size is much smaller t han clutch size. (2) Selection should usually favor an optimal size of offspring rather than varied sizes within a clutch. However, constrai nts intrinsic to mechanisms of parental protection or provisioning may change these predicted outcomes of selection on life history traits. (1) Provisioning and packaging of protected embryos may introduce depe ndence of offspring size on adult size or clutch size. (a) Clutches of embryos are a large mass of metabolizing tissue without a circulatory system but with requirements for gas exchange; when dissolved gases a re transported by interstitial flow between embryos, requirements for supply of oxygen may require larger offspring in thicker and hence mor e massive clutches. (b) Offspring size can become dependent on adult s ize through capsule size or size of the birth canal, and offspring siz e is thereby linked to clutch mass when clutch mass increases with adu lt size. (2) Random placement of protected embryos may increase variat ion around an optimum size or quality of offspring. Possible examples are (a) determination and packaging of nurse eggs that will be consume d by embryos and (b) hormonal interactions among offspring in a uterus . Constraints that violate general expectations and arise from varied and specific mechanisms of parental protection or provisioning may be common.