Rj. Preston et al., RECONSIDERATION OF THE GENETIC RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ETHYLENE-OXIDE EXPOSURES, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 26(3), 1995, pp. 189-202
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed a genetic risk
assessment model for exposures to ethylene oxide utilizing data on the
induction of reciprocal translocations in mole germ cells [Rhomberg e
t al. 1990]. This particular approach served as a reasonable initial a
ttempt, albeit somewhat limited with regard to endpoint and only parti
ally attentive to the mechanisms of induction of genetic alterations a
nd the behavior of chromosomes during meiosis. The present paper discu
sses the scientific basis for a reassessment of the EPA model, providi
ng data and hypotheses related to effective dose to the target cells a
nd shape of the dose-response relationship at low doses, and dose rate
s. While the present genetic risk assessment approach is discussed in
terms of ethylene oxide, it would be applicable to most mutagenic chem
icals. The outcome of the discussion is that the generic risk for expo
sed males from reciprocal translocation induction will be negligible a
t low doses since the dose-response curve is likely to be a function o
f the square of the dose. In addition, the proportion of genetically u
nbalanced live born offspring in humans arising from reciprocal transl
ocation carriers is less than 10% of the frequency formed through meio
tic segregation and fertilization for such carriers. Simply from a con
sideration of mechanism-namely, the very high probability of DNA repai
r prior to the next S-phase for a resting oocyte-it would be predicted
that there would be a very low to negligible frequency of translocati
ons in Female germ cells from ethylene oxide exposure. It is further s
tressed that additional components of a genetic risk model require a c
onsideration of all germ cell stages in the mole, and the inclusion of
calculations for point and deletion mutations. Some indications of li
kely response are presented with these points in mind. (C) 1995 Wiley-
Liss, Inc.