Mj. Wright et al., EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS DURING COVERT ORIENTATION OF VISUAL-ATTENTION - EFFECTS OF CUE VALIDITY AND DIRECTIONALITY, Biological psychology, 41(2), 1995, pp. 183-202
Covert orientation of attention was studied in 30 adults who fixated w
arning cues and pressed a button at target onset, Directional cues (ar
rows) indicated the most probable (p = 0.8) side of target occurence,
Subjects responded fastest when validly cued, slowest to invalidly cue
d targets, and at an intermediate rate when the cue (a cross) was not
directional. Directional cues took longer to evaluate (increased N1 an
d P2 latencies) and produced more focussed attention and greater respo
nse preparation (enhanced CNV and P3 amplitude) than non-directional c
ues, These findings indicate that the expectancy of a target can be ma
nipulated by a spatial cue at three levels, sensory, attention, and re
sponse preparation, and lead to changes in the sensory perceptual proc
essing of the target. Validly cued targets produced an increase in P1
amplitude reflecting attention enhanced sensory processing whereas inv
alidly cued targets increased N1 and P3 amplitudes reflecting the re-o
rientation of attention, and further processing and updating of inform
ation required of low probability stimuli respectively. P3 latency to
invalidly cued targets was also delayed reflecting the additional proc
esses required to shift attention to a new location. The P3 latency va
lidity effect was smaller than that found for response time suggesting
response execution may also be affected by spatial attention.