Te. Towheed et Mc. Hochberg, A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY IN OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP, Journal of rheumatology, 24(2), 1997, pp. 349-357
Objective, To systematically review all randomized controlled trials (
RCT) of pharmacological therapy in osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. To
determine which nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) is the most
effective, and which NSAID is the most toxic. Methods, A MEDLINE sear
ch was used to identify RCT of pharmacological therapy in patients wit
h OA of the hip published between 1966 and August 1994. Qualitative as
sessments were performed using a quality scoring system designed for N
SAID trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Both the design and analysis aspe
cts of the trials were evaluated, each aspect rated on a scale of 0 to
8. A quantitative method, which calculates the ratio of improvement p
roduced by one NSAID to that produced by another, was used to rate the
relative efficacy of different NSAID with respect to pain relief. Tox
icity comparisons were made according to the authors' findings. Result
s, 43 RCT were identified, and of these, 39 evaluated NSAID while 4 ev
aluated only analgesics. The median design and analysis scores were 2
and 4, respectively. 6 NSAID were included in at least 5 trials; of th
ese, indomethacin was rated more effective in 5 of its 7 comparisons,
but more toxic in 7 of 12 comparisons. Only 5 of the 29 (17% NSAID com
parisons found statistically significant differences in efficacy, Conc
lusion. NSAID trials in patients with OA of the hip appear to be weake
ned by the lack of standardization of case definition of OA, and also
by the lack of standardization of outcome assessments. No recommendati
ons for the choice of specific NSAID therapy in hip OA can be offered
based on this analysis.