We discuss approaches for efficiently evaluating potential surrogate m
arkers; in particular, we focus on case-cohort designs in which marker
evaluation is undertaken only for a random sample of subjects within
a randomized trial and for all other subjects who develop a major clin
ical outcome. These designs will be useful in clinical trials in which
a highly significant treatment difference on clinical outcome has bee
n obtained. In addition, we describe a method for using data from all
available studies using a meta-analysis to explore the association of
treatment effects on the potential marker and on clinical outcome. Thi
s may be the most effective approach for marker evaluation because it
uses data from both large and small trials and incorporates informatio
n from trials in which nonsignificant treatment differences on the maj
or clinical outcome are obtained.