This article focuses on the interconnection between international fact
ors and domestic political conflicts in the Third World context, with
specific reference to Caribbean countries. Theories suggesting either
no correlation or a direct linear linkage between international and do
mestic conflicts are criticized. It is posited that (a) the linkage be
tween international pressures and domestic political conflicts is usua
lly mediated by domestic class forces, particularly the contentious ro
le of the middle classes, which invariably control Caribbean states, (
b) these middle-class controlled states usually display a preference f
or the more authoritarian approaches to conflict resolution; (c) state
s subjected to the most destabilizing international pressures, such as
the ideologically deviant (or pro-socialist) states, tend to display
the more intensive levels of both political conflicts and repressive f
orce; and (d) these conflict patterns harbour largely negative implica
tions for democratic developments in the region. It is suggested, furt
her, that approaches to conflict resolution should involve institution
alized changes which foster the more direct, democratic inclusion of t
he subordinate classes in the political decision-working process. Supp
ortive data and evidence are drawn from periodical news reports and ot
her documentary archival sources pertaining to the English-speaking Ca
ribbean during the post-colonial period.