Twenty patients (complete AV block n = 13, sick sinus syndrome n = 4 (
replacement of a VVI system), bradyarrhythmia n = 3) with rate-adaptiv
e pacemakers (respiration volume guided n = 10, QT-driven n = 1, dual
sensor (QT/activity) system n = 9) were randomly assessed by ergospiro
metry after 4 weeks of VVI- (70 bpm), VVIR(1)-(70-110 bpm, low upper r
ate) and VVIR(2)-pacing (70-130 bpm, high upper rate). Oxygen uptake (
VO2), work load (W), and heart rate were determined at peak exercise (
max) and at the anaerobic threshold (AT). In the whole population, rat
e adaptation led to a significantly higher VO2-max than VVI-pacing for
both VVIR(1)-(15.5 +/- 5.1/12.6 +/- 4.1 mg/kg/min, 28 +/- 37%, p < 0.
01) and VVIR(2)-pacing (14.8 +/- 4.4/12.6 +/- 4.1 ml/kg/min, 20 +/- 23
%, p < 0.01). At the AT, however, VO2 was significantly improved only
by the VVIR(1) mode (low upper rate, 9.8 +/- 2.5/8.0 +/- 2.1 ml/kg/min
, 28 +/- 36%, p < 0.01). Regarding only patients with moderately limit
ed exercise capacities (Weber class C, n = 11), rate adaptive VVIR(1)
and VVIR(2) pacing could not produce a significant increase of VO2-max
and VO2-AT. In contrast, patients with severely reduced exercise capa
cities (Weber class D, n = 9) significantly profited from the rate ada
ptation, but only in the VVIR(1), mode (VO2-max 48 +/- 45%, VO2-AT 51
+/- 38%, p < 0.01), Thus, in the whole population an increase of oxyge
n uptake and of exercise workload at the anaerobic threshold could onl
y be achieved by pacing with the low upper rate of 110 bpm. By this, p
articularly patients with heart failure and a severely limited exercis
e tolerance (Weber D) had a significant benefit. Therefore, the upper
rate should be programmed in a lower range in patients with heart fail
ure, at least for rate-adaptive ventricular pacemaker systems.