NONREAMED NAILING OF CLOSED AND MINOR OPEN TIBIAL FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH BLUNT POLYTRAUMA

Citation
Bl. Riemer et al., NONREAMED NAILING OF CLOSED AND MINOR OPEN TIBIAL FRACTURES IN PATIENTS WITH BLUNT POLYTRAUMA, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (320), 1995, pp. 119-124
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Orthopedics
ISSN journal
0009921X
Issue
320
Year of publication
1995
Pages
119 - 124
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(1995):320<119:NNOCAM>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
A retrospective comparison of dynamic and static locking mode nonreame d nails in 88 closed, Grades I and II open tibial fractures is present ed, Amount of time and number of reoperations required to unite fractu res were compared for dynamic (Group 1, n = 31) and static locked (Gro up 2, n = 13) Winquist I and II fractures, and dynamic (Group 3, n = 1 4) and static locked (Group 4, n = 30) Winquist III, IV, and segmental fractures, Total reoperations also were compared: Tibias treated with dynamic nails united in an average of 20 weeks, with 3 reoperations; tibias treated with static locked nails united in an average of 30 wee ks, with 21 reoperations. Group 1 fractures united in an average of 20 weeks, with 1 reoperation; Group 2 fractures united in an average of 32 weeks, with 4 reoperations. Group 3 fractures united in an average of 20 weeks; Group 4 fractures united in an average of 29 weeks, with 11 reoperations. In the group of tibias treated with dynamic nails, 3 additional operations were done; in the group of tibias treated with s tatic locked nails, 7 additional operations were done, There was 1 inf ection and 3 deformities, Static locking mode appeared to delay union, especially when Groups 1 and 2 are compared; these fractures can be n ailed without locking screws.