Objective: We performed through-the-scope-manometry of the esophagus o
n 12 patients referred for esophageal symptoms. Methods: A 3-lumen pol
yvinyl tube was passed through the biopsy channel of a standard video-
endoscope. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with thro
ugh-the-scope-manometry as well as a conventional laboratory-based man
ometric study; the sequence of the procedures was randomized. Results:
Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 18 +/- 11 mm of mercury
by both methods. In the lower esophagas, mean wave amplitude was 60 +/
- 25 mm of mercury by through-the-scope manometry and 82 +/- 28 by lab
oratory testing. In the upper esophagus, mean wave amplitude was 50 +/
- 26 mm of mercury by through-the-scope manometry and 63 +/- 20 by lab
oratory testing, Wave duration tended to be lower by through-the-scope
manometry than by laboratory testing in the lower and upper esophagus
, In nine patients with normal esophageal motility, 54% of swallows re
sulted in a peristaltic wave by the endoscopic study versus 100% for t
he laboratory test. Conclusion: Through-the-scope-manometry was able t
o accurately measure lower esophageal sphincter pressure compared with
laboratory-based manometry. Peristaltic wave amplitude by through-the
-scope manometry was reduced compared with laboratory-based manometry,
most likely because of the use of dry swallows. Through-the-scope-man
ometry has promise as a screening test for esophageal motility disorde
rs.