RESISTANCE OF THE FAILING DYSTROPHIC HAMSTER HEART TO THE CARDIOPROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF DILTIAZEM AND CLENTIAZEM - EVIDENCE OF CORONARY VASCULAR DYSFUNCTIONS
M. Tanguay et al., RESISTANCE OF THE FAILING DYSTROPHIC HAMSTER HEART TO THE CARDIOPROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF DILTIAZEM AND CLENTIAZEM - EVIDENCE OF CORONARY VASCULAR DYSFUNCTIONS, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology, 73(8), 1995, pp. 1108-1117
Although hypothermia and cardioplegic cardiac arrest provide effective
protection during cardiac surgery, ischemia of long duration, poor pr
eoperative myocardial function, and ventricular hypertrophy may lead t
o heterogeneous delivery of cardioplegic solutions, incomplete protect
ion, and impaired postischemic recovery. Calcium antagonists are poten
t cardioprotective agents, but their efficacy in the presence of cold
cardioplegia is still controversial, especially in heart failure, sinc
e it is often believed that failing hearts are more sensitive to their
negative inotropic and chronotropic actions. However, recent data hav
e demonstrated that the benzothiazepine-like calcium antagonists dilti
azem and clentiazem, in selected dose ranges, elicit significant cardi
oprotection independently of intrinsic cardiodepression, thus lending
support to their use in cardioprotective maneuvers involving the faili
ng heart. We therefore evaluated the cardioprotective interaction of d
iltiazem, clentiazem, and cold cardioplegia in both normal and failing
ischemic hearts. Hearts were excised from 200- to 225-day-old cardiom
yopathic hamsters (CMHs) of the UM-X7.1 line and age-matched normal he
althy controls. Ex vivo perfusion was performed at a constant pressure
(140 cmH(2)O; 1 cmH(2)O = 98.1 Pa) according to the method of Langend
orff. Heart rate, left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP), and coro
nary flow were monitored throughout the study. Global ischemia was pro
duced for 90 min by shutting down the perfusate flow, followed by repe
rfusion for 30 min. Normal and failing CMH hearts were either untreate
d (control) or perfused at the onset of global ischemia with one of th
e following combinations: cold cardioplegia alone (St. Thomas' Hospita
l cardioplegic solution, 4 degrees C, infused for 2 min), cold cardiop
legia + 10 nM diltiazem, or cold cardioplegia + 10 nM clentiazem. The
cardiac and coronary dilator properties of 10 nM diltiazem and 10 nM c
lentiazem alone were investigated in separate groups of isolated prepa
rations. Failing CMH hearts had lower basal LVDP (42 +/- 2 vs. 77 +/-
2 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133.3 Pa) for normal hearts, p < 0.05), while coronar
y flow was only slightly reduced (5.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.2 mL/min f
or normal hearts). Following 90 min global ischemia, coronary flow was
increased in both groups, but the peak hyperemic response declined on
ly in failing CMH hearts (+50 +/- 17 vs, +82 +/- 17% in normal hearts)
. In normal hearts, LVDP virtually recovered within 5 min of reperfusi
on but steadily decreased thereafter (-37 +/- 4% at 30 min). In contra
st, in failing CMH hearts, LVDP significantly decreased early during r
eperfusion but improved over time (-19 +/- 7% at 30 min). In normal he
arts, the addition of diltiazem or clentiazem to cold cardioplegic sol
utions resulted in improved postischemic contractile function for the
duration of reperfusion (85 +/- 4% vs. only 71 +/- 6% for cardioplegia
, p < 0.05). The post-ischemic increase in coronary flow was similar i
n all groups. In failing CMH hearts, the addition of diltiazem or clen
tiazem afforded no significant contractile benefit at reperfusion. In
nonischemic normal hearts, infusion of diltiazem or clentiazem (10 nM)
alone increased coronary flow (+6 +/- 1% for diltiazem and +24 +/- 3%
for clentiazem) without significant negative inotropic or chronotropi
c effects. In nonischemic failing CMH hearts, infusion of diltiazem or
clentiazem did not elicit cardiodepression. In contrast their coronar
y dilator actions reverted to vasoconstriction (diltiazem) or were sig
nificantly attenuated (clentiazem). From these experiments we can conc
lude that, compared with the normal heart, the failing CMH heart adapt
ed differently to global ischemia. In addition to potential alteration
s in membrane integrity and changes in calcium handling, attenuation o
f the coronary dilator response to diltiazem and clentiazem rather tha
n an increased sensitivity to their intrinsic cardiodepressant actions
appears as a potential contributor to the lack of cardioprotection by
these calcium antagonists in the failing CMH hearts.