Kd. Wenstrom et al., COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE-MARKER SCREENING WITH AMNIOCENTESIS FOR THE DETECTION OF FETAL ANEUPLOIDY IN WOMEN GREATER-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-35 YEARSOLD, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 173(4), 1995, pp. 1287-1292
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the multiple-marker screening te
st with elective amniocentesis for the detection of fetal Down syndrom
e and other aneuploidies in women aged greater than or equal to 35. ST
UDY DESIGN: Our database included the multiple-marker screening test (
maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, unconj
ugated estriol, and maternal age) and genetic amniocentesis results fr
om 1942 women aged greater than or equal to 35. A Down syndrome risk g
reater than or equal to 1:190 was considered screen positive. An algor
ithm to detect trisomy 18 was also used. RESULTS: The multiple-marker
screening test Down syndrome screen-positive rate was 26.1% (507/1942)
. The Down syndrome detection rate was 75% (33/44); the trisomy 18 det
ection rate was 75% (3/4). However, the multiple-marker screening test
detection rate for all aneuploidies was only 61%. Missed aneuploidies
included trisomy 21, sex chromosome abnormalities, trisomy 13, trisom
y 22, and trisomy 18. CONCLUSIONS: The multiple-marker screening test
fails to detect approximately 39% of all fetal aneuploidies in women a
ged greater than or equal to 35. These data should be provided to wome
n considering prenatal diagnosis so that they can make an informed dec
ision regarding the multiple-marker screening test versus amniocentesi
s for advanced maternal age.