In engineering, medicine, biology and agriculture, it is often desired
to replace an invasive or slow measurement method, by nondestructive,
faster or less expensive methods. The inevitable question is whether
the two measurement methods are interchangeable. To answer this questi
on, the common practice is to use linear regression based equations, a
s scale translation rules. It is shown that this approach is not optim
al, when both measurement methods are noisy. Accordingly, a new approa
ch for method comparisons is proposed, by high fidelity translation of
the readings taken on the scale of one test, to the scale of another
test, and vice verse. The proposed scale translation mode is based on
minimizing the sum of squares of the differences between the absolute
values of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) series, derived from the re
adings of the compared measurement methods. Whereas regression methods
attempt to find the parameters of a line that provides the best fit t
o the observed data pairs, the FFT equalization method strives to find
the parameters of a line that can render the difference between the t
ranslated readings as close to zero as possible. The line taken is ill
ustrated by a comparative study on several artificial datasets of line
arly related paired X, Y readings, with various levels of measurement
noise. Quality criteria were developed for quantitative comparison of
linear regression based, scale translation models versus the new metho
d, while using the results from the artificially generated datasets fo
r illustration. The comparisons indicate that scale translation by the
FFT equalization method is optimal in terms of these quality indexes.