The early phases of formation in the inner solar system were dominated
by collisions and short-range dynamical interactions among planetesim
als. But the later phases, which account for most of the differences a
mong planets, are unsure because the dynamics are mote subtle. Jupiter
's influence became more important, leading to drastic clearing out of
the asteroid belt and the stunting of Mars's growth. Further in, the
effect of Jupiter- both directly and indirectly, through ejection of m
ass in the outer solar system- was probably to speed up the process wi
thout greatly affecting the outcome. The great variety in bulk propert
ies of the terrestrial bodies indicate a terminal phase of great colli
sions, so that the outcome is the result of small-N statistics, Mercur
y, 65 percent iron, appears to be a residual core from a high-velocity
collision. All planets appear to require a late phase of high energy
impacts to erode their atmospheres: including the Earth, to remove CO2
so that its ocean could form by condensation of water. Consistent wit
h this model is that the largest collision, about 0.2 Earth masses, wa
s into the proto-Earth, although the only property that appears to req
uire it is the great lack of iron in the Moon. The other large differe
nces between the Earth and Venus, angular momentum (spin plus satellit
e) and inert gas abundances, must arise from origin circumstances, but
neither require nor forbid the giant impact, Venus's higher ratio of
light to heavy inert gases argues for it receiving a large icy impacto
r, about 10(-6) Earth masses from far out, requiring some improbable d
ynamics to get a low enough approach velocity. Core formation in both
planets probably started rather early during accretion. Some geochemic
al evidences argue for the Moon coming from the Earth's mantle, but ar
e inconclusive. Large scale melting of the mantle by the giant impact
would plausibly have led to stratification. But the ''lock-up'' at the
end of turbulent mantle convection is a trade-off between rates: crys
tallization of constituents of small density difference versus overall
freezing. Also, factors such as differences in melting temperatures a
nd densities, melt compressibilities, and phase transitions may have h
ad homogenizing effects in the subsequent mantle convection.