Magnetic field exposures pose serious questions to the public. The sci
ence is not sufficiently clear or consistent to result in a consensus.
Some scientists view the data as strongly suggestive and argue that i
f the association is true, the ubiquity of exposure may be resulting i
n a marked underestimation of the actual risk. Others argue that the i
nconsistencies in the data and the specific limitations of the studies
suggest that there is no association and no reason for concern. The s
tate of the science is such that a definitive resolution is unlikely i
n the next few years. In light of this uncertainty, I believe that the
most prudent course of action is the prevention or limitation of expo
sure where feasible at limited cost and inconvenience. Be it at home o
r at work, prevention of exposure is simply good public health practic
e.