This paper demonstrates that choice processing may be different in mis
sing information situations than in full information situations depend
ing on whether inferences are used to fill in missing values and the o
verlap of the missing information itself. It is shown that when indivi
duals do not form inferences to fill in missing values, fewer full att
ribute-based processes and more processes which accommodate for missin
g attribute values, alternative-based or given-dimension attribute-bas
ed, are used. It is also shown that when a processing shift due to mis
sing information does occur, the overlap of the missing values will af
fect the type of shift that takes place. If overlap is high, a shift t
o given-dimension attribute-based processing is more likely, and when
overlap is low, a shift to alternative-based processing is more likely
. When individuals do form inferences to fill in missing values, proce
ssing is more similar to that in full information situations. Finally,
it is shown that individuals will often partially fill in missing inf
ormation, thus moderating the proposed effects.