Be. Gary et al., COMPARISON OF A MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY-BASED IGM CAPTURE ELISA WITH A NEUTRALIZATION ASSAY FOR ASSESSING RESPONSE TO TRIVALENT ORAL POLIOVIRUSVACCINE, The Journal of infectious diseases, 175, 1997, pp. 264-267
Monoclone-based IgM capture ELISAs were developed for each of the thre
e poliovirus serotypes and compared with a neutralization assay for de
tecting response to trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine among 224 infant
s. The IgM-based response rates were significantly higher than the neu
tralizing antibody-based rates: 958 versus 83% to poliovirus type 1, 9
9% versus 94% to poliovirus type 2, and 89% versus 59% to poliovirus t
ype 3. IgM responses to the first vaccine dose were significantly asso
ciated between serotypes, suggesting that some of the discordance may
reflect a heterotypic IgM response. When the response rates in 4 vacci
ne formulation groups were compared, group differences using the two a
ssays were similar for poliovirus types I and 2 but not for type 3. Th
erefore, IgM results using these assays may not be adequate substitute
s for neutralizing antibody results when determining vaccine response.