Researchers have examined various techniques to solve the problem of m
issing data. Simple techniques have included listwise deletion, pairwi
se deletion, mean substitution, regression imputation and hot-deck imp
utation. Past research suggests that regression imputation and pairwis
e deletion generally result in less dispersion around true score value
s while listwise deletion results in more dispersion around true score
s. Unfortunately, this research spent much less lime examining whether
the various techniques lead to overestimation or underestimation of t
he true values of various statistics. The present study utilized a Mon
te Carlo Analysis to simulate an HRM research setting to evaluate miss
ing data techniques. Pairwise deletion resulted in the least dispersio
n around true scores and least average error of any missing data techn
ique for calculating correlations. Implications for use of these techn
iques and future missing data research were explored.