Ms. Rieber et M. Rieber, SUPPRESSION OF CYCLIN D1 BUT NOT CDK4 OR CYCLIN-A WITH INDUCTION OF MELANOMA TERMINAL DIFFERENTIATION, Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 216(1), 1995, pp. 422-427
To identify cyclins specifically associated with control of melanoma c
ell proliferation, we now compared expression of cyclin A, reported to
be a marker for hematological malignancies, with. that of cyclin D an
d its cdk4 kinase partner. All these proteins were expressed in prolif
erating B16 melanoma. However, L-tyrosine which induces melanoma termi
nal differentiation, selectively decreased cyclin D with no comparable
effect on cdk4 or cyclin A. A 5-hour exposure of the cells to the tyr
osine phosphatase inhibitor, sodium vanadate,further decreased cyclin
D from differentiated cells, suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation
regulates cyclin D turnover. Addition of serum to starved cells also r
evealed that tyrosine did not block the early cyclin D increase associ
ated with serum stimulation, but accelerated its subsequent loss. Our
data suggest that cyclin D decrease with melanoma terminal differentia
tion could be an alternative mode of growth arrest even in cells harbo
uring a mutant or transcriptionally silent cdk4 inhibitor tumor suppre
ssor p16(ink4) gene. These results also imply that cyclin D may be use
ful as a target and as a prognostic marker in melanoma therapy. (C) 19
95 Academic Press, Inc.