ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN X-RAY AND NEUTRON THERMAL VIBRATION PARAMETERS

Authors
Citation
Rh. Blessing, ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN X-RAY AND NEUTRON THERMAL VIBRATION PARAMETERS, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science, 51, 1995, pp. 816-823
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Crystallography
ISSN journal
01087681
Volume
51
Year of publication
1995
Part
5
Pages
816 - 823
Database
ISI
SICI code
0108-7681(1995)51:<816:OTDBXA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
For crystal structures analyzed by both X-ray and neutron diffraction, the anisotropic mean-square displacement parameters of the non-H atom s are sometimes found to differ significantly. The differences can usu ally be adjusted by either: (1) an isotropic factor q, defined by U-X( ij) = qU(N)(ij), to correct for a temperature difference between the t wo experiments; (2) anisotropic factors q(ij), defined by U-X(ij) = q( ij)U(N)(ij), to correct for a temperature difference and different ani sotropic diffraction effects of absorption, extinction, thermal diffus e scattering, multiple reflection, or systematic measuring errors in t he two experiments; (3) anisotropic diffraction correction terms Delta U-ij, defined by U-X(ij) = U-N(ij) + Delta U-ij; (4) the sum of an is otropic temperature correction and anisotropic diffraction corrections , defined by U-X(ij) = qU(N)(ij) + Delta U-ij. Correction parameters q , q(ij) and Delta U-ij are easily calculated by linear least-squares f it, and the corrections from (3) or (4) seem to be the most reliable. Corrections calculated from X-ray and neutron U-ij's of the non-H atom s of a crystal can be useful for adjusting the neutron U-ij's of the H atoms for adoption, along with the neutron coordinates of the H atoms , as fixed parameters in an X-ray analysis of the electron density dis tribution.