CONTRASTS OF ESOPHAGEAL-FISTULA VERSUS BITE-COUNT TECHNIQUES TO DETERMINE CATTLE DIETS

Citation
Im. Ortega et al., CONTRASTS OF ESOPHAGEAL-FISTULA VERSUS BITE-COUNT TECHNIQUES TO DETERMINE CATTLE DIETS, Journal of range management, 48(6), 1995, pp. 498-502
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience",Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
0022409X
Volume
48
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
498 - 502
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-409X(1995)48:6<498:COEVBT>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
To understand how different techniques might affect diet estimates for cattle, the esophageal-fistula and bite-count techniques were compare d using trained cattle, For the Texas Coastal Bend, bite-count was not as reliable a technique as the esophageal fistula, These techniques d iffered in estimation of forage classes and plant species in cattle di ets, The esophageal-fistula technique was more accurate however, the b ite-count technique may be acceptable if analyses are limited to only those plant species making up >2% of the diet.